Comparison of methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration: an approach to the management of water resources within an experimental basin in the Brazilian Cerrado.

Enter multiple e-mails separated by comma.

imagem

Author(s): GOTARGO, J. T.; RODRIGUES, L. N.; GOMES, B. M.

Summary: ABSTRACT: This study aimed to compare methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration using an experimental basin in the Brazilian Cerrado, for water management purposes. For that, we estimated daily reference evapotranspiration over a certain period (time series between 1982 and 2012) through different empirical methods. These methods consisted of Blaney-Criddle (BC), Hargreaves & Samani (HS), ASCE Penman-Monteith (ASCE- PM), Penman (1948/1963) (PO), Priestley-Taylor (PT), which were all compared to the standard Penman-Monteith FAO-56 (PM-FAO56). Based on statistics, ASCE- PM, P and BC methods should be recommended for cerrado areas, either in rainy or dry seasons. After these, the PT also stood out. Among the less complex methods, based on temperature and energy data, PT method is recommended whether climatological data are scarce either in rainy or dry seasons. Yet, HS reached the greatest errors, a broad data spread and low estimate accuracy, but showing better performance in dry periods, thus remaining under restricted use.

Publication year: 2016

Types of publication: Journal article

Unit: Embrapa Cerrados

Keywords: Cerrado, Evapotranspiração, Método, Penman Monteith FAO 56, Recursos hídricos

Further information Download publication (PDF)

Observation

Some of Embrapa's publications are published as ePub files. To read them, use or download one of the following free software options to your computer or mobile device. Android: Google Play Books; IOS: iBooks; Windows and Linux: Calibre.

 

Access other publications

Access the Agricultural Research Database (BDPA) to consult Embrapa's full library collection and records.
Visit Embrapa Bookstore to purchase books and other publications sold by Embrapa.