Author(s): CASARI, R. A. C. N.; PAIVA, D. S.; SILVA, V. N. B.; FERREIRA, T. M. M.; SOUZA JUNIOR, M. T.; OLIVEIRA, N. G.; KOBAYASHI, A. K.; MOLINARI, H. B. C.; SANTOS, T. T.; GOMIDE, R. L.; MAGALHÃES, P. C.; SOUSA, C. A. F. de

Summary: The feasibility of thermography as a technique for plant screening aiming at drought-tolerance has been proven by its relationship with gas exchange, biomass, and yield. In this study, unlike most of the previous, thermography was applied for phenotyping contrasting maize genotypes whose classification for drought tolerance had already been established in the field. Our objective was to determine whether thermography-based classification would discriminate the maize genotypes in a similar way as the field selection in which just grain yield was taken into account as a criterion. We evaluated gas exchange, daily water consumption, leaf relative water content, aboveground biomass, and grain yield. Indeed, the screening of maize genotypes based on canopy temperature showed similar results to traditional methods. Nevertheless, canopy temperature only partially reflected gas exchange rates and daily water consumption in plants under drought. Part of the explanation may lie in the changes that drought had caused in plant leaves and canopy structure, altering absorption and dissipation of energy, photosynthesis, transpiration, and partitioning rates. Accordingly, although there was a negative relationship between grain yield and plant canopy temperature, it does not necessarily mean that plants whose canopies were maintained cooler under drought achieved the highest yield.

Publication year: 2019

Types of publication: Journal article

Unit: Embrapa Agroenergy

Keywords: Canopy temperature, Déficit hídrico, Fenotipagem de plantas, Milho, Plant phenotyping, Termografia, Thermal image, Tolerância à seca, Water deficit, Zea Mays, abiotic stress