Autoria: BEHRAVESH, C. B.; CHARRON, D. F.; LIEW, A.; BECERRA, N. C.; MACHALABA, C.; HAYMAN, D. T. S.; ZANELLA, J. R. C.; FARAG, E.; CHAUDHARY, A.; BELLES, H.; ADISASMITO, W. B.; ALMUHAIRI, S.; BILIVOGUI, P.; BUKACHI, S. A.; CASAS, N; CUNNINGHAM, A. A.; DEBNATH, N.; DAR, O.; DUNGU, B.; GAO, G. F.; KHAITSA, M.; KOOPMANS, M. P. G.; MACKENZIE, J. S.; MORAND, S.; SMOLENSKIY, V.; ZHOU, L.; MARKOTTER, W.; METTENLEITER, T. C.

Resumo: Abstract: The global demand from multi-sectoral partners for operational tools for One Health implementation and capacity building is increasing, yet a validated global inventory of One Health tools did not exist. Here, we map and analyze available One Health tools and assess their suitability to support One Health implementation, including the One Health Joint Plan of Action 2022–2026 (OH JPA). Our objectives were to identify (i) publicly available One Health tools to support capacity building and OH JPA implementation; (ii) optimal outcomes for countries/regions using available One Health tools; (iii) linkages to OH JPA Action Tracks and pathways in the One Health Theory of Change (TOC); and (iv) gaps and priorities for the development of additional One Health tools. One Health High Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP) members compiled information on One Health tools that were publicly available and released up to June 30, 2023, via online sources and partner networks including the Quadripartite organizations. Inclusion criteria addressed One Health relevance, use at the national, subnational, or regional level in ?5 locations, and publicly available information. Tools were assessed for applicability by OH JPA action track, TOC pathway, scope, and intended outcomes, as well as the extent to which tools addressed gender equality, social inclusion, and environmental dimensions of One Health. Of 132 candidate tools, 50 (38%) met the inclusion criteria. These tools addressed all six OH JPA Action Tracks, but relatively fewer tools addressed Action Tracks 4 (Food Safety), 5 (Antimicrobial Resistance), and 6 (Environmental Integration). Tools were available to support all three TOC outcome pathways, and many addressed more than one Action Track and TOC outcome pathway. Most available One Health tools addressed assessment and to a lesser extent implementation, with fewer tools available for action planning, prioritization, and monitoring. Gaps and opportunities for improving One Health tools were identified, including the integration of the environment dimension, gender equality, and social inclusion. Ultimately, our findings will contribute to further the advancement of One Health globally, including via OH JPA implementation, while spurring adjustments to existing One Health tools and the development of new ones to address key gaps.

Ano de publicação: 2024

Tipo de publicação: Artigo de periódico

Unidade: Embrapa Suínos e Aves

Palavras-chave: Animal health, Collaboration, Ecosistema, Ecosystems, Environment, Gender, Multi-sectoral, One Health initiative, Public health, Saúde Global, Saúde Pública, Saúde animal, Saúde mundial, Saúde única