Deviations in Peer Review Processes: a study of Funding Selection Practices.
Deviations in Peer Review Processes: a study of Funding Selection Practices.
Author(s): PINTO, D. M.
Summary: ABSTRACT: Recent discussions regarding more transparent practices of research prioritization, selection, and funding involves, among other aspects, a deeper understanding of traditional procedures for scientific evaluation, known as peer review. In this context, discussions frequently highlight potential limitations of the classic peer review model, which is seen as vulnerable to various forms of interference and inaccuracies that may impact both the selection of research for funding and the determination of publication outcomes (Recio- Saucedo et al., 2022). Despite this acknowledgment, research on peer review is scarce, both when considering this practice in the context of scientific journals (Squazzoni et al., 2020) and funding agencies. One of the main reasons for this gap is the absence of data.
Publication year: 2024
Types of publication: Abstract in annals or event proceedings
Unit: Embrapa Territorial
Keywords: Research prioritization
Observation
Some of Embrapa's publications are published as ePub files. To read them, use or download one of the following free software options to your computer or mobile device. Android: Google Play Books; IOS: iBooks; Windows and Linux: Calibre.
Access other publications
Access the Agricultural Research Database (BDPA) to consult Embrapa's full library collection and records.
Visit Embrapa Bookstore to purchase books and other publications sold by Embrapa.